You May Not Be A Betting Man or Woman, But Alaska Has Become A Betting State

For years Alaska leaders have shunned warnings about overspending and being too dependent on volatile oil prices.  How many still think placing bets on the volatile gas market via equity ownership in an LNG project is wise?

Commentary by

Dave Harbour

Today Standard & Poor's and Moody's credit rating agencies lowered the credit rating of the State of Alaska.  

Here are today's Standard & Poor's and Moody's rating announcements.

Here is Governor Bill Walker's response to those ratings.  Governor Bill Walker, Photo by Dave Harbour(We are a little surprised that he considers these third party creditworthiness ratings "premature".  

Alaska's whole budget problem is that it has, in effect, considered disciplined budgeting "premature", year after year.  Note 1. Also, the agencies have warned Alaska that, absent significant improvement, this was coming.  -dh  Note 2.  Note 3.)


Other reference points:

Kenai Peninsula Clarion Report

Today's energy outlook from our anonymous Australian energy advisor, and

Yesterday's energy outlook from our Mid-Atlantic energy advisor.  

-dh


According to a December Gallup Poll, when asked to choose among "big government," "big labor" and "big business," respondents overwhelmingly selected big government as the biggest threat to the country in the future.

The negative outlook expressed by the agencies applies not only to general obligation debt, which pledges the full faith and credit of the state to bondholders, but also to revenue bonds and other "moral obligation" debt — like that which may subsidize the building of a government created gas utility in Fairbanks.  

We have long predicted this turn of events and have also advised readers that political realities and human nature would not likely result in spending restraint until elected officials were faced with a head-on crash into a fiscal brick wall.  

While today's reports were troubling enough, they do not fully explore the negativity of Alaska's budget imbalance.  

Just imagine how continuing lowering of creditworthiness affects the desire to invest in Alaska by major oil and mining companies!  Or tourism and commercial fishing companies!  Or those considering the buying or building of new homes or offices!  

Will not thoughtful investors be thinking, "Gee, if Alaska can't balance its budget and is within a few years of spending all of its available savings and still owes the state employee retirement funds billions of dollars there's no doubt that state and municipal tax hawks will want me to pay more for their lack of planning!"  

Today's credit downgrades and negative outlooks by credit raters is either step one toward establishing reasonable budget practices in Alaska, or the first step toward an economic depression that could be more severe than the one Alaska experienced in the late 1980s.  

Back then, Alaska and its producers suffered from low oil prices but was producing a huge volume of oil in a full pipeline that helped the economy survive, albeit in rags.  

Today:

  • oil prices are low,
  • Alaska's dependence on oil remains close to 90%,
  • Alaska's oil pipeline is nearly 3/4 empty,
  • the State's available savings are fast depleting,
  • half the State operating budget is subsidized by plundering savings accounts and, finally,
  • elected officials are focusing on expanding taxes on Alaska investors at a time when their economic wellbeing is already threatened.  

How does a state or nation controlled by freely elected politicians control its addiction to over tax and to over spend?

Wise minds have already provided a proven answer to this question.  Perhaps the first step toward controlling overtaxing and overspending is to admit the problem exists.

"We admitted we were powerless over our addiction – that our lives had become unmanageable"

-dh

Alaska's Institute of Social and Economic Research (ISER) has been warning Alaskans and their elected leaders since the early 1990s to control spending, to develop a sustainable budget, to create a "safe landing" for a state economy overly dependent on the historic volatility of energy prices. 

We will be very disappointed in any leader who begins a scapegoat tirade to the effect that: "We didn't know", or, "It's big oil's fault."

Finally, anyone who still thinks that Alaska should be owing equity interest in a gas pipeline that has not even been proved economically feasible (i.e. betting on the price of gas in a historically volatile energy industry) is wishing the state to become even more dependent on volatility, risk and purely lucky betting.  Meanwhile, equity interest requires, "putting up the ante", as costs to determine feasibility increase.

What if the State continues its socialistic, quixotic quest for ownership of the State's private energy industry?

Some will say, "Don't be so hard on the State; we're not gamblers, we're just taking partial ownership."

To that, a wise observer might respond, "You say you are not gamblers.  We investors already know what you are; we're just waiting to see to what degree you continue your irresponsible behavior."

The truth hurts, doesn't it? 

Maybe thoughtful decision makers will review their history of increasing taxes to create and bloat new, unsustainable spending programs.  Maybe they'll analyze why they've doubled the size of government in the past few years.  Maybe they'll realize their undisciplined practices have been the very reasons pressure is now building to increase taxes.

For, from an investor's viewpoint, Alaska's volatile tax/spending structure is not inviting.  Alaska's retroactive taxation history is downright highway robbery.  

You'd think that a place with the most harsh climate, most difficult geography, highest labor costs, and highest logistical prices and history of mistreating investors would be bending over backward to retain spending and taxing discipline.  

You'd think that such a State — at least from this day forward — would want to be known as a place where, "a deal is a deal."


Energy Perspectives From Our Anonymous Energy Analyst Advisors in Australia and the Mid-Atlantic States:

Yesterday, we brought you the 2016 oil and gas perspective from our Mid-Atlantic, anonymous  energy analyst friend (Scroll down).  Today, comes a perspective half a world away, from our anonymous Aussie oil and gas analyst friend who understands the Alaska and Canada energy picture a well as any North American.  You can also find his blog here….  -dh

Introduction

As well as making prognostications, the start of a new year is a time to look back and learn.  The top 5 lessons for this blogster from 2015 were as follows:

  1. Oil supply in the face of falling prices has been far more resilient than we expected.  This prevails across the globe – in the tight oil fields of the USA, the old Russian fields, in a falling-apart Iraq, for small Mom and Pop stripper wells, etc.  This is partly due to good old fashioned ingenuity in the face of adversity – and partly due the extreme prisoner's dilemma that the industry faces (everyone should just cut production by 1-2% and the market would re-balance – but why do so if others won't?).
  2. The US gas price continues to be ultra-low and well below break-even levels, even in the face of increasing exports by pipe and soon to be by boat.  And a massively lower rig count.  For 2015 this was arguably due to the afore-mentioned resilience combined with the very mild US winter.  We still expect US gas prices to rise materially – but as John Meynard Keynes famously said – "The market can stay irrational longer than you can stay solvent.”
  3. Don't believe in the conspiracy theories of an efficient Machiavellian OPEC that is employing smart strategies to destroy US and/or Russian competition.  These guys cannot organise their equivalent of a p*ss-up in a brewery – the Haj.  OPEC is Saudi Arabia and there is a largely hidden "Game of Thrones" likely afoot in the Kingdom over the succession.
  4. "Events" in the Middle East in 2015 did not disrupt oil markets in meaningful ways – surprisingly so compared to other times in the oil market's history.  This may of course change (see 3 above) – the key is where the "events" occur.  Syria is not a material oil producer.
  5. The "Golden Age of Gas" has yet to arrive – and indeed in many markets gas is being squeezed between coal and renewables.  LNG markets have accordingly been weak and their outlook is poor in the medium term.  It remains to be seen whether policy mechanisms will change this – the evidence is scant to say that they will, even in mature countries like Australia.

Commodity prices

Crude prices finished fairly flat yesterday, with Brent closing at US$37.27 and WTI at US$36.76.  However, during the course of the trading day there was much volatility, as markets tried to balance bullish news from Middle Eastern "events" (i.e. the shocking escalation of Sunni/Shia tensions induced by the KSA's recent executions) and bearish news from Chinese stock-market falls.

Henry Hub closed down 2% at US$2.30.

LNG and international gas

With US LNG exports imminent, weak Asian demand and an "anybody but Gazrprom" buyer mindset, Europe is the destination of choice for the global LNG market at present.

However, we note that the warm winter weather being experienced in the US is also present across the Atlantic, and this, combined with economic weakness, has led to European gas storage levels being at 6 year highs.

Company news – AWE

AWE announced today that it (and partner Origin Energy

[ORG]) has FID'ed stage one of its Perth Basin gas project.  Underpinned by a short term gas contract with retailer Alinta Energy, the joint venture has committed to connect a couple of cased-and-suspended recent delineation wells to existing production facilities.

Capturing market (albeit on confidential terms and only for small volumes for a couple of years) is arguably the key news item here.  The future of Western Australia's gas market is currently clouded with uncertainty as massive volumes of "domestic reservation" gas from Gorgon and Wheatstone over-hang the supply side.

Company news – ORG

Yesterday's Australian Financial Review (AFR) noted that ORG's sale process for its Perth and Cooper Basin assets was on track to receive expressions of interest by the end of this month.

The AFR quoted an analyst from Citibank as estimating the value of ORG's Perth Basin assets as being ~A$300M – a figure we note as being higher than the market cap of its partner AWE.

Analysts are less bullish on ORG receiving good (or indeed any) bids for its Cooper Basin assets.  We reflect on the strong competition between Santos and Beach Energy the last time (2006) a stake in this venture came on the market and note the vastly different animal spirits that now prevail.

Company news – FAR Ltd

FAR came out of yesterday's trading halt this morning with good news on the testing program for its SNE-2 well offshore Senegal.  Strong and sustained flow rates of high quality oil were reported.

FAR's share price has gone up 7% on this news.  In a bull market the response would likely have been an order of magnitude higher.

Quote of the day

The Donald dosen't have a monopoly on colourful quotes, as evidenced by the following from Poland's new Foreign Minister:

“As if the world, in a Marxist fashion, were destined to evolve only in one direction—towards a new mix of cultures and races, a world of vegetarians and bicyclists.” 


Governor Bill Walker's response today to rating agency announcements:

“The action taken by Standard & Poor’s to lower Alaska’s credit rating is concerning and premature given that the legislature has not had time to act on a long-term fiscal plan.  However, this further solidifies the need to address our state’s fiscal challenges in the immediate future. As noted in S&P’s release today, Alaska has significant financial assets that, if properly utilized, can help build fiscal stability for our state. I agree with S&P that the stakes are high for Alaska to enact a sustainable fiscal package, but it’s important to do what is right for our state’s future versus what may be politically appealing. As we approach the 2016 legislative session, I encourage every legislator and Alaskan to read the memos released by Standard & Poor’s and Moody’s in their entirety. I look forward to working with lawmakers to enact a complete fiscal package that protects the opportunities available to future generations of Alaskans.” 


Our October 25, 2015 editorial…

 

For Whom The Bell Tolls

 
TODAY, our readers can link to the Alaska Legislature's streaming videos of hearings dealing with the Alaska LNG project.
 
Be sure to go to church first and pray, "for whom the bell tolls."  Here's why.
 
The U.S. could count on Alaska for hundreds of thousands of new jobs and an infusion of hundreds of billions of dollars throughout the entire country's manufacturing, transportation, and service sectors.
 
But hostile federal regulatory activity, coupled with environmental activism, is keeping critical resources of a state 20% the size of America, effectively off limits.
 
The federal actions are exacerbated by a governor whose free market and oil industry investment policies are both hostile and irrational.
 
Today, our readers will see a plot unveiled by video before their eyes: as the governor tries to convince legislators to invest billions into an LNG project's equity at a time when 1) the state can't afford it, and 2) the majority of the world's LNG projects — many, many of which seem more economically feasible — are in the process of being abandoned or delayed.
 
The governor may be panicking, for to observers the state looks functionally broke as the perfect economic storm gains force and momentum within the 49th state:
  • Alaska's government operates with a $3-4 billion annual deficit and its leaders display pitifully little determination to restrain spending; and
  • its accessible savings accounts will be dry, unable to support deficit spending within a couple years; and
  • it has not been able to pay down a nearly $10 billion unfunded liability of its state and local government employee and teacher unfunded pension liability; and
  • its $50 billion+ Permanent Fund (PF) corpus cannot be tapped by the Legislature without a Constitutional amendment, which its PF Dividend-addicted citizens are loathe to give; and
  • its deficit situation grows worse as the nearly 3/4 empty Trans Alaska Pipeline System (TAPS) continues to lose oil throughput at a 5-6% annual rate; and
  • its state budget is 90% dependent on that dwindling TAPS throughput; and
  • its entire economy is over 1/3 dependent on TAPS economic activity, and
  • the credit rating agencies are beginning to downgrade the credit worthiness of the state, thus compounding its troubles as the cost of borrowed money increases.  (Yesterday, if you were watching the Legislative video, you heard financial advisers warning that borrowing money now would be at the most favorable time, before further rating downgrades occur…but that if the state had to borrow later to support failing Alaska LNG project equity commitments, the whole world would know its financial problem and lenders would require still higher risk premiums in return for their investments.)  
In economic terms, to be frank and realistic, one realizes during these hearings that Alaska is facing the specter of an "economic death spiral" if major, difficult decisions are not made very soon.

We would wonder how a state in such circumstances would waste even a weekend discussing the possibility of providing  a multi-billion dollar 'deficit investment' in an project when 1) payback is not likely to occur for a decade, and 2) the depletion of deficit supporting savings accounts and perhaps the termination of TAPS operations could occur within just a few years, and 3) completion risk of an LNG project in today's world environment is sky high.

Meanwhile, caught in the quagmire of these circumstances amid a perfect economic storm, the Alaska governor is pressuring the Legislature to pass a contingent natural gas reserves tax on the very companies he hopes will build an LNG project.

The federal hostility against Alaska is cutting off sources of new TAPS-replenishing, Arctic oil income and a hostile state administration cannot help but have the effect of further discouraging, if not alienating, investors.

New readers might ask of us: "For whom does the bell toll?"

 
Without some kind of a born again experience, Alaska, we fear that, indeed, the bell "tolls for thee".

Don't forget to tune in after church.  This will be interesting.

Read more here….