Comment: Today, millions of Americans struggle to pay taxes and complete complex tax filing requirements. How many Americans realize that politicians are diverting painful chunks of their tax payments to political allies whose alternative energy projects are uneconomic? The pain to family pocketbooks is exacerbated when politicians force consumers (i.e. including taxpayers) to pay higher utility bills that further fund these uneconomic, high cost energy projects Bookmark this unforgivable example of political income redistribution for future reference! Even worse, note that Alaska legislators are considering expansion of this assault on consumers by forcing the Regulatory Commission of Alaska and utilities to accept and have consumers pay for uneconomic sources of power. -dh
Today, the House Natural Resources Subcommittee on Federal Lands held an oversight hearing titled, “Federal Land Acquisition and its Impacts on Communities and the Environment.” Witness testimony focused on the Land and Water Conservation Fund Act (LWCF) of 1965, which expires on September 30, 2015.
Our friend, Pedro van Meurs (File photo with author) provides our readers with the latest Mexico Bid Provisions and Model Shallow Water Contract:
___________________
Please click here for the commentary of Jay Park QC and me on the latest Mexico Bid Provisions and Model Contract for shallow water of March 25, 2015.
Many improvements were made in the package since December 11, 2014. Nevertheless, there are many remaining issues.
A detailed review of the Mexican terms will be provided in my courses in Rio de Janeiro on May 18 and May 25 this year.
Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments.
Best regards, Pedro van Meurs VAN MEURS CORPORATION Po Box CR-56766 # 1261 Nassau, Bahamas Phone: 1 242 324 4438 Fax: 1 242 324 4439Email: info@vanmeurs.org
NEWSWEEK: WHAT’S THE TRUE COST OF WIND POWER?
Randy Simmons, professor of political economy at Utah State University, recently co-authored an article with Strata Policy Analyst Megan Hansen that sheds light on the true, hidden cost of wind power. Simmons and Hansen find that the enormous amount of federal subsidies and grants given to wind power every year make it hard for Americans to understand just how much they’re paying for such an inefficient, costly resource. An excerptfrom their findings follows:
The high costs of federal subsidies and state mandates for wind power have not paid off for the American public. According to the Mercatus Center at George Mason University, wind energy receives a higher percentage of federal subsidies than any other type of energy while generating a very small percentage of the nation’s electricity.
In 2010 the wind energy sector received 42 percent of total federal subsidies while producing only 2 percent of the nation’s total electricity. By comparison, coal receives 10 percent of all subsidies and generates 45 percent and nuclear is about even at about 20 percent.
Wind gobbles up the largest share of subsidies yet produces little power.
But policymakers at the federal and state level, unfortunately, have decided that the American people will have renewable energy, no matter how high the costs. As a result, taxpayers will be stuck paying the cost of subsidies to wealthy wind producers.
Meanwhile, electricity consumers will be forced to purchase the more expensive power that results from state-level mandates for renewable energy production. Although such policies may be well intended, the real results will be limited freedom, reduced prosperity and an increasingly unreliable power supply.
You can read the rest of Simmons and Hansen’s piece here.

Leave A Comment